If I only had The
Conduct of Life as an example of Fornes’ work, I might conclude judging
from the play that in addition to having pared—down sometimes even abrupt
scenes that her dramaturgical style also includes a heavy use of
monologues. By this I mean that she uses
them much more often than the average playwright does and frankly they are the
majority of the play. For example, scene
1 is a monologue by Orlando and directly after that in scene 2 there is another
series of monologues by Leticia and Orlando and this trend continues through
out the remainder of the play with some exceptions. I think that Fornes choosing to do this has a
very powerful effect. For me, it was a
direct look into the characters thoughts and feelings without having to go
through a filter of dialogue to another character. They were honest and true with themselves
because they didn’t have to hide behind some sort of mask like they did when
interacting with others. They could just
be their raw human selves with imperfections, desires, and passions and we got
to see them through their eyes and from each character’s perspective. I believe that the play is called The Conduct of Life because of the play
is all about the events that happen in life and having a true response to those
things and having to deal with them but also having that drive in the back of
your mind that yes life happens and a lot of times it is so unfair and cruddy
but life does go on and that we should use these things that happen to us as a
growing experience. In life we tend to
forget that other people are people and I think Nena puts it best when she says
“I should not blind myself with rage, but I should see them and receive them,
since maybe they are in worse pain than me” and that is the way that we should
conduct our lives, not be torn down by the adversity but build our selves up
and rise stronger from it.
I agree that the use of multiple monologs was a dramaturgical choice that Fornes decided to incorporate into her play, The Conduct of Life. I think Fornes choose to have each character speak mostly in monologue form in order for the audience to connect with each character on some level. Through this connection the audience is able to understand what each character is perhaps thinking, and also understand their motivation behind certain actions.
ReplyDeleteI like how you view the monologues for the play Yvette. I hadn’t thought about the difference between dialogues and monologues before but you make it excellent point about how the characters don’t need to filter themselves in monologues the way they do in dialogue, and I agree that they do make the characters show their ‘raw human selves’. Thank you so much for pointing that out.
ReplyDelete