I actually really like this idea
of a “blank, "abstract," and minimalistic setting and design idea for this show
and I would love to see it done like
this as opposed to a production of it with historically accurate costumes and
an elaborate set and props. A production
like this, I believe would carry a stronger message because it would minimalize
distractions and really make the audience focus on the characters facial expressions,
reactions and dialogue. They audience
would be able to home in on what they characters were actually saying and
exactly how they felt or perceived about an object that they encountered rather
than the audience actually being able to see said object and making them focus
on the object rather than the actual reactions to the object. The reactions to the items found throughout the
play are what make the play so enticing, not exactly what the objects look
like. The text itself is very meticulous
in the way it describes things. The
dialogue creates a very vivid imagery in which it doesn’t leave the audience guessing
as to what exactly the women found when they were rummaging through the
house. The audience can paint a picture
in their minds primarily on the comments the women made about the quilt or the
box or the bird. There was a lot of
attention to detail and frankly I think that physically having these elaborate
props would be more distracting from the story than if they were present. Even though I would prefer a minimalistic production,
it would lose quite a bit. I think that
the costumes especially, if they were only in black clothing rather than
historically accurate attire would take something away. Even though, it is obvious as to the time
period and the life style is sort of evident in the dialogue, it would be
helpful to have the costumes to reinforce the idea of where women stood in this
time and how insignificant men regarded their opinions and banter to be. The
costumes would be a consistent reminder of the time period and allow the
audience to more easily connect the female characters to their position in life. In addition, I do feel like seeing the bird
all mangled in the box would be really daunting for the audience to see and
make it that much more of a tense moment rather than depending on the audience
to e very focused and hung on every word and relying on them to be creative and
imaginative. I think having such a
minimalized production would indeed be risky , but I think it would add to the
rawness of the show and really get to
the heart of how these women felt about not only themselves, but how men saw
them and in the end their sympathy and sense understanding they had for Minnie
Foster.
After reading this response and letting the play simmer, I totally agree with you Yvette. I do think that a minimalistic set would be a good choice due to the mere challenge it presents because Trifles is all about detail. If this idea is put into operation, in a world with little to nothing, details would be savored because they’d be hard to come by. It would add an extra element to the script and possibly force the audience to become even more aware of what’s going on. It would take the attention off of the props and place more focus on the two women and what they’re going through too. I also mentioned how this would be a risky endeavor, but I feel like it’s worth a try and if done correctly, it could be a huge success.
ReplyDeleteI entirely agree with you guys, mostly because of the aforementioned attention-to-detail in the script itself. Trifles could have been written to engage the imaginations of an audience watching an empty stage, kind of like the classic Shakespearean shoe-horned setting descriptions (“Verily, it sure is raining, and this is a castle, and that is a forest, forsooth!”). It would also probably call attention to some men who don’t pay attention to “trifles” by not visually showing the props—after all, what IS the difference between quilting and knotting?
ReplyDelete